Policy overview
A shared framework for editors, authors, reviewers, and staff.
These guidelines support The Standard Series and any publishing activity handled by Pantheon Academic. They are designed to make editorial decisions consistent, transparent, and accountable.
Fair assessmentManuscripts should be evaluated on scholarly merit, relevance, originality, and methodological soundness. | Confidential handlingSubmitted work, reviewer identities where applicable, and editorial discussions must be handled with care. | AccountabilityConcerns, corrections, conflicts, and ethical questions should be addressed through a clear process. |
![]() | For editors Editorial decisions must be independent, fair, and well documented.Editors are responsible for protecting the quality of the journal, managing manuscripts consistently, and ensuring that peer review is handled without improper influence.
|
For authors Authors must submit original, accurate, and ethically prepared work.Authors are expected to present their research honestly, credit contributors accurately, disclose relevant information, and correct the scholarly record when needed.
| ![]() |
![]() | For reviewers Peer review should be confidential, constructive, and objective.Reviewers support editorial decision-making by providing careful assessments, identifying strengths and limitations, and flagging ethical or citation concerns.
|
Publishing support
Professional handling from submission to post-publication concerns.
Staff, editors, and journal representatives should work together to keep the publication process clear, respectful, and consistent.
For staffStaff should maintain professionalism, confidentiality, impartiality, and clear communication with authors, reviewers, and editors. | Ethical concernsSuspected plagiarism, data issues, duplicate submission, authorship disputes, or undisclosed conflicts should be reported with supporting evidence. | Corrective actionOutcomes may include clarification, correction, expression of concern, retraction, institutional notification, or restrictions on future submission. |
Addressing concerns Ethical issues are reviewed carefully and proportionately.Allegations should be handled without prejudice, with attention to evidence, confidentiality, journal policy, and the integrity of the scholarly record.
| ![]() |
Commitment to ethical publishing
Trust is built through clear standards and consistent action.
Pantheon Academic is dedicated to a transparent, rigorous, and responsible publishing environment that supports authors, reviewers, editors, and the global academic community.
© 2026 Pantheon Academic. All Rights Reserved.




